Methodology notes, from our own team.
Practical, specific guidance from our methodologists and consultants, not general advice you could find anywhere.
All articles
What Happens After You Submit: The Peer Review Process for Systematic Reviews
Systematic review peer review often involves a methods-focused reviewer checking specific, predictable things before anyone evaluates your conclusions at all.
Jul 2026 · 5 min read · By Sarah Bennett
A Systematic Review on AI in Public Health: A Practical Guide
AI in public health spans disease surveillance, outbreak prediction, and resource allocation tools, and a systematic review here benefits from explicit attention to equity considerations.
Jul 2026 · 5 min read · By Dr. Grace Mwangi
Quality Appraisal Tools Beyond Risk of Bias: AMSTAR, CASP, and More
Risk of bias is not the only quality appraisal a systematic review might need: several other tools exist for different appraisal purposes entirely.
Jul 2026 · 5 min read · By Dr. Elena Kowalski
How Many Studies Do You Need for a Systematic Review?
There is no universal minimum study count for a valid systematic review, but a few specific thresholds do meaningfully affect what your review can and cannot reliably claim.
Jul 2026 · 5 min read · By Dr. Samuel Osei
Systematic Reviews of Prevalence and Incidence: A Different Kind of Question
Reviews estimating how common a condition is use genuinely different appraisal tools and pooling methods than reviews asking whether an intervention works.
Jul 2026 · 5 min read · By Dr. Grace Mwangi
Piloting Your Data Extraction Process Before You Start
Skipping the pilot step is one of the most common reasons a review team ends up re-reading every included study a second time.
Jul 2026 · 5 min read · By Dr. Lauren Ito
Getting Extraction Support for a Large Systematic Review
Extraction volume that felt manageable in planning can become a genuine bottleneck once a review’s actual included study count becomes clear, and support at this stage has a specific, well-defined shape.
Jul 2026 · 5 min read · By Dr. Lauren Ito
Bias in Individual Studies vs. Bias in the Review Process Itself
Risk-of-bias assessment addresses one kind of bias entirely, but a review’s own conduct can introduce a genuinely different, equally consequential kind.
Jul 2026 · 5 min read · By Dr. Elena Kowalski
Equity-Focused Systematic Reviews: The PROGRESS-Plus Framework
Equity-focused systematic reviews use a specific framework to make sure a review actually reports whether an intervention works differently across disadvantaged groups.
Jul 2026 · 5 min read · By Dr. Grace Mwangi
A Systematic Review on Large Language Models in Research
Large language models in research spans literature screening assistance, data extraction automation, and manuscript drafting support, each a distinct question worth its own review.
Jul 2026 · 5 min read · By James Okafor
Risk of Bias at the Outcome Level vs. the Study Level
A single study can carry meaningfully different risk-of-bias judgments for different outcomes it reports, and treating the whole study as one uniform rating misses this.
Jul 2026 · 5 min read · By Dr. Samuel Osei
Systematic Reviews Outside Health: Education, Environment, and Social Policy
Systematic review methodology extends well beyond medicine, with its own established traditions and organizations supporting rigorous evidence synthesis in social science and policy fields.
Jul 2026 · 5 min read · By Dr. Priya Nair
Have a question this didn’t answer?
Tell us about your review and we’ll point you to the right starting point.
Get a Quote →- Free, no-obligation quote
- Reply within 12 hours
- NDA on every project
- PRISMA 2020 compliant