Methodology notes, from our own team.
Practical, specific guidance from our methodologists and consultants — not general advice you could find anywhere.
All articles
Cochrane vs. JBI Methodology: What’s the Real Difference?
Both are rigorous, internationally recognized systematic review methodologies, but they differ meaningfully in scope, tools, and typical use case.
Aug 2026 · 5 min read · By Dr. Amara Chen
How to Choose the Right Journal for Your Systematic Review
Journal choice made after the manuscript is finished usually means reformatting under deadline pressure. Made before writing starts, it can shape decisions the review actually needs.
Aug 2026 · 5 min read · By Sarah Bennett
How to Write a Systematic Review Abstract That Gets Read
Your abstract is read far more often than your full manuscript, and PRISMA expects a specific structure most first drafts miss.
Aug 2026 · 5 min read · By James Okafor
How to Write a Systematic Review Protocol (Step-by-Step)
A protocol written before you start screening is what separates a defensible systematic review from one that draws reviewer objections. Here is how to build one properly.
Aug 2026 · 2 min read · By Dr. Amara Chen
A Systematic Review on AI Bias and Fairness in Algorithmic Systems
AI bias and fairness research uses genuinely inconsistent definitions of fairness itself, and a systematic review needs to address this measurement inconsistency directly rather than assume a shared standard.
Jul 2026 · 5 min read · By Dr. Elena Kowalski
Risk of Bias Assessment Support for Your Review Team
Risk-of-bias assessment is one of the most consequential steps in a systematic review, and it is also one of the most common places outside support genuinely changes the final result.
Jul 2026 · 5 min read · By Dr. Samuel Osei
Reviewing Machine Learning in Clinical Prediction Models
Machine learning clinical prediction models are a genuinely distinct systematic review category, with their own dedicated appraisal tool and their own specific reporting expectations.
Jul 2026 · 5 min read · By Dr. Samuel Osei
Inter-Rater Reliability in Systematic Reviews: Understanding Kappa Statistics
Reporting screening agreement as a raw percentage overstates reliability, since some agreement would occur by chance alone even without any genuine consistency.
Jul 2026 · 5 min read · By Dr. Lauren Ito
Mixed-Methods Systematic Reviews: Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Evidence
Combining quantitative and qualitative evidence in a single review requires a genuine, deliberate integration design, not just two separate syntheses placed side by side.
Jul 2026 · 5 min read · By Dr. Elena Kowalski
Quality Appraisal Consulting: When Your Team Needs a Second Opinion
Quality appraisal disagreements that will not resolve internally, or a nagging uncertainty about whether the right tool was even chosen, are the clearest signals a second opinion is worth seeking.
Jul 2026 · 5 min read · By Dr. Elena Kowalski
Budgeting for a Systematic Review: A Realistic Breakdown
Budgeting for a systematic review as a single lump sum obscures where cost actually concentrates, and screening volume drives this more than almost any other factor.
Jul 2026 · 5 min read · By Dr. Grace Mwangi
What Happens After You Submit: The Peer Review Process for Systematic Reviews
Systematic review peer review often involves a methods-focused reviewer checking specific, predictable things before anyone evaluates your conclusions at all.
Jul 2026 · 5 min read · By Sarah Bennett
Have a question this didn’t answer?
Tell us about your review and we’ll point you to the right starting point.
Get a Quote →